For the Manner by which we take Notice of a Conception past, we are to remember, that in the Definition of Imagination, it is said to be a Conception by little and little decaying, or growing more obscure. An obscure Conception is that which representeth the whole Object together, but none of the smaller Parts by themselves; and as more or fewer Parts be represented, so is the Conception or Representation said to be more or less clear. Seeing then the Conception, which when it was first produced by Sense, was clear, and represented the Parts of the 0bject distinctly; and when it cometh again is obscure, we find missing somewhat that we expected; by which we judge it past and decayed. For Example, a Man that is present in a Foreign City, seeth not only whole Streets, but can also distinguish particular Houses, and Parts of Houses; but departed thence, he cannot distinguish them so particularly in his Mind as he did, some House or Turning escaping him: yet is this to remember; when afterwards there escape him more Particulars, this is also to remember, but not so well. In Process of Time, the Image of the City returneth but as a Mass of Building only, which is almost to have forgotten it. Seeing then Remembrance is more or less, as we find more or less Obscurity, Why may not we well think Remembrance to be nothing else but the missing of Parts, which every man expecteth should succeed after they have a Conception of the Whole? To see at a great Distance of Place, and to remember at great Distance of Time, is to have like Conceptions of the Thing: for there wanteth Distinction of Parts in both; the one Conception being weak by Operation at Distance, the other by Decay.